Arrian does not mention what happened after Alexander’s death since the accounts of both Ptolemy and Aristobulus stopped at this point. However, he adds a splendid eulogy to the greatness of Alexander. Diodorus follows the same idea, stating that “He accomplished greater deeds than any, not only of the kings who had lived before him but also of those who were to come later down to our time.”
Only Curtius’ history continues
describing the mourning in the streets of Babylon by friend and foe, the earliest rivalry between the generals, and all kinds of
intrigues that followed the king’s death. He is the only one to mention that Alexander laid unattended
for seven days before his friends reentered the room. So much for a “friend,”
right. He reports how his body did not show any sign of decay despite the
Babylonian heat. As a result, the Egyptians and Chaldeans “who were ordered” to
care for the body hesitated to handle it. It is only after they prayed to their
gods for approval that “they emptied his body of entrails.” He goes on by
saying that the gold coffin was filled with perfumes – yet nothing about the
honey that covered Alexander’s
body as seen by those who paid their respects to him years later in
Several questions arise after reading these accounts. Curtius, for instance, is the only one to tell us about the widespread quarrel among the generals and troops alike (not yet about the matter of succession) and about the decision to embalm Alexander’s body. Plutarch casually remarks that the body remained unattended for several days.
What transpires
is that nobody stayed at Alexander’s
bedside after he was declared dead. It is baffling and truly unacceptable
vis-à-vis the King of Macedonia, the King of Kings, to be left without a single
soul at his side to mourn him?
About a week later, the king’s entourage seemed to remember that their king was dead and required burial of some kind. According to Curtius, who appears the only source on this matter, “Egyptians and Chaldeans were ordered to care for the body.” Nobody says who issued such an order. The priests certainly would not act on their own to handle the remains of the King of Kings, the most powerful man of the world! Was there any discussion about the procedure and the choice of a funeral?
In
How, then, was
it decided that Alexander
should be mummified? His body was originally to return to
Another
possibility is that the commanders were still fighting each other and had not
decided where to bury their king despite leaving him unattended for about a
week. The obvious place was
But who
performed the embalming on so short a notice? It is highly improbable that
priests could have been summoned so quickly from
Craftsmen from
across the empire created an unsurpassed funerary golden catafalque. Alexander’s preserved body
was placed inside a gold sarcophagus inlaid with precious stones. It was
covered with a purple funerary pall embroidered with gold, on top of which lay
his armor and Trojan shield. After two years of careful and intense work, the
shrine was ready, and the funeral
cortege left Babylon for
In the following centuries, the tomb was visited by many Roman emperors till it disappeared from history. That was between the mid-3rd century and the last quarter of the 4th century AD.
No comments:
Post a Comment