How the Arabs saved our knowledge from antiquity

In my post, The story around Alexander’s copy of the Iliad, I briefly mentioned how the Abbasid Caliphs in Persia largely contributed to preserving the knowledge of the ancient Greeks. 

A few years ago, my attention was drawn to the glory days of Baghdad around 1000 AD, a city built inside a circle surrounding the central Abbasid Palace, a symbol of power and unity. More amazing than its shape was the fact that its Caliphs invested in hiring scholars to translate ancient Greek documents into Arabic. 

[Baghdad under the early Caliphs. Attribution]

Baghdad was built along the Tigris River in 762 AD, as the residence of Caliph Al-Mansur, the founder of the Abbasid Caliphate. The Abbasid Dynasty was named after the uncle of Prophet Muhammad. A Caliph was the title of the civil and religious leader of a Muslim state, seen as representing Allah on earth. 

Al-Mansur was the first Caliph to honor astrologers. The most famous astrologer was Mash’allah from Basra, who served the Caliphs from 762 to 809 AD. Al-Mansur was convinced that it was written in the stars that the Abbasids were the legitimate successors of the Persian Sassanid Empire. They had been in power from 224 until 651 AD, when they were conquered by the Muslims. Since astrology did not exist in Arabic, Al-Mansur needed to revert to Persian and Greek astrological texts. As a result, he needed these ancient texts to be translated into Arabic.

By 786 AD, Caliph Harun al-Rashid established the House of Wisdom in Baghdad, which originally may have been a Library, where scholars from across the Muslim world would organize their translations. The idea caught on, and other centers flourished a few centuries later in Cordoba and Granada in Spain, as well as in Cairo, Egypt. 

In the western Roman world, we saw our ancient knowledge and know-how disappear into the dark Middle Ages soon after the Fall of Rome in 476 AD. In the Eastern Roman or Byzantine Empire, however, the science of Antiquity survived despite the rise of Christianity. Constantine the Great had made it the official religion, renaming its capital Byzantium after himself, Constantinople.

When Islam entered the stage in the 7^th century AD, the Abbasid Caliphate, established in Damascus, was a serious competitor to Constantinople. In about 750 AD, the Caliphate was transferred from Damascus to Baghdad, meaning that the center of power moved east from a Greek-speaking region to a non-Greek-speaking area. Followed a series of wars between the Caliphate and the Byzantine Empire that lasted until the 11^th century. 

All that time, the knowledge from Antiquity flowed into Baghdad, where a vast translation project was set up, and top translators were highly rewarded in gold. They concentrated on matters like astronomy, geometry, arithmetic, and even music theory. Aristotle was still held in high esteem, his works as well as his comments. Later translations included Claudius Ptolemy's Almagest, a mathematical and astronomical treatise on the motions of the stars and planets; Euclid's book on geometry; the medical works of Hippocrates and Galen; and Plato’s Republic and Laws. Many other ancient books were translated from Greek, Pahlavi, Neo-Persian, and Syriac into Arabic. 

Simultaneously with this translation movement, Islamic science developed, involving philosophers and scientists alike. A name that stands out is that of Ibn Sina, better known as Avicenna (980-1037), the Father of Early Medicine, whose work was standard in Europe for centuries. Another figure was Al-Khwarizmi (780-860), the Father of Algebra, who introduced the algorithms.

By the mid-11^th century, the ideas of antiquity reached Europe in Arabic, traveling to Sicily and Muslim Spain. Over time, they had been enriched with the knowledge that the Caliphs in the Middle East had acquired and developed. We owe it to the Abbasids that the knowledge from classical antiquity reached Europe, where it was generally translated into Latin. 

The Abbasid Caliphate ended in 1258 when Baghdad was sacked by the Mongols. The city was looted and thoroughly destroyed. The invaders burned piles of books, including those that were held in the House of Wisdom. 

Without Baghdad and its western expansion, we would have remained stuck in the dark Middle Ages, and there would not have been a Renaissance. 

Macedonian swords set against history

As mentioned in an earlier post (see: Alexander’s battle outfit), the Macedonians basically used two types of swords. The straight sword with a double-edged blade, which was most popular, was about 60-70 cm long. The blade was exceptionally efficient because of the swelling toward the sword’s tip. It added weight and momentum to each blow. It was used by cavalry and infantry alike, as it functioned for hacking and stabbing. 

The kopis, or saber-shaped sword with the crooked hilt, was less common. The blade was 40-60 cm long, and only the curved side had a cutting edge. The kopis was more effective for fights on horseback since the rider could deliver a heavy blow from above. 

Sources tell us that the Cyprian King of Citium (ancient Larnaca) gave Alexander a masterly executed sword, which was exceptionally light and well-tempered (see: The role of Cyprus in Alexander’s campaign). 

Quality swords were widespread among Alexander’s commanders and even common troops. Several memorable encounters have been reported by our historians. The most striking one was when Cleitus, with a single blow, severed the arm and shoulder of a Persian attacking Alexander at the Granicus. The Paeonian cavalry leader Ariston used his sword to behead the Persian leader Satropates during a skirmish near the Tigris River. 

The kopis were handled by the Macedonians at the Hydaspes to slash at the elephants’ trunks. Ptolemy drove his sword through the thigh of a local chief during the Indian expedition, and Alexander cut off the hand of his Arab assassin with one stroke of his sword during the siege of Gaza. The Macedonian tradition of handling weapons with high cutting capacity is still alive in 276 BC when King Pyrrhus inflicted such a blow to his adversary that he cleaved his opponent in two parts, falling to either side! 

Now we may wonder where and how all these swords were made. Cyprus was known for its quality weaponry, but did the artisans accompany the Macedonians into Asia, or did they train a selected number of people in this specific craftsmanship? Either theory is plausible. 

There is, however, the case of Porus’ gift. After the Battle of the Hydaspes, King Porus gave Alexander a precious sword. This story leads us to another source, Wootz Steel (the name is a corruption of ‘ukku’), a well-kept secret amongst the metallurgists in India. The name first appeared when Alexander received a gift of over 2500 kg of ‘white iron’, a kind of steel that originated in India millennia before reaching Europe. 

Wootz steel is a type of crucible steel made using a clay crucible. The vessel was closed and heated for several days to a temperature of 1300-1400 degrees Celsius. In the process, the quality of the product acquired high ductility, high impact strength, and reduced brittleness. After a slow cooling, the Wootz ingots were ready. Archaeologists discovered an industrial steel center from around the 3^rd century BC in the southern state of Tamil Nadu. 

How was this new technology received in the Macedonian camp? It is hard to imagine that Alexander did not explore or use the possibilities of this Wootz steel. He always was a ringleader when confronted with new inventions and improvements in warfare. The next time we hear about this revolutionary steel is that Indians had a monopoly over the production and export of Wootz steel from the 3^rd to the 17^th century, reaching from the Roman Empire in the West to China in the East. 

In the Middle Ages, Damascus became the main supplier of the famous Damascene swords, which is only another name for weaponry made using Wootz steel. 

By the 8^th century, manufacturing in India had spread throughout Central Asia, where the Vikings had established trade posts to exchange their furs and slaves over Eurasia. Hoards of Arab dirhams have been found in Scandinavia, documenting these trades. As a result, by the 9^th century, the Vikings produced high-quality Ulfberht swords, made of crucible steel known as Wootz steel. 

[Picture from Ulfbeht sword - Credits: Secrets of the Viking sword]

The blades of Viking swords were generally 70 to 90 centimeters long and 5-6 centimeters wide. The so-called Ulfberht swords carried the inscription +VLFBERH+T, which may be linked to some religious invocation rather than the maker’s signature. The earliest known specimen was created in the 9^th century and was one of the heaviest (1.9 kg) and longest (102 cm) Viking swords. It is exhibited at the Museum of Cultural History in Oslo. Another surviving example is the sword of Saint Stephen from the 10^th century, which was the coronation sword of the Hungarian King Stephen. It still has its walrus-tooth hilt. 

The so-called Lincoln sword from the same era is one of only two known swords bearing the inscription +LEUFRIT, also made of crucible (most probably Wootz) steel. It was found near Monks Abbey in Lincolnshire, UK, in 1848. 

It is noteworthy that the science behind the production of Wootz steel was only understood in the 20^th century! From a technological point of view, this means that the metallurgists of ancient India were far, really far ahead of their time! 

Unfortunately, history has, to my knowledge, not linked the weaponry from Cyprus to the Wootz steel swords made in India. Consequently, we still don’t know how Alexander acted and reacted to Porus’ highly prized gift. I can’t imagine that Alexander did nothing to explore this newly acquired knowledge.

Dining the Persian way

“What disturbs me most is not your lack of respect for my judgment, it’s your contempt for a world far older than ours!” Alexander pronounced these words in Oliver Stone’s movie, casually placed in the king’s upcoming wedding with Roxane. It is just a detail, but one that resonates much further than we may see at first glance. 

For the Greeks and the Macedonians, the Persians were Barbarians. They certainly could not imagine their refined culture, splendid cities and monuments, and accoutrements. As a great admirer of Cyrus, the very founder of the Achaemenid dynasty, Alexander clearly understood that Persia was much older than Greece and consequently had built up a richer civilization. 

Oliver Stone rightfully illustrated the grandeur and richness of the Persian Empire in Babylon when he orchestrated Alexander’s triumphal entrance march! This was the first major city the Macedonians saw with their own eyes, leaving them in total awe. The pomp and circumstance of Persepolis and Susa added to their astonishment and wonder. 

Although Alexander and his companions were familiar with the palaces of Aegae and Pella, these edifices could in no way compete with anything in Persia. Athens was a gem of its own right, with the shining Parthenon finished a good hundred years before. In contrast, Persian history, refinement, protocol, and wealth testified to their cultural superiority. It must have been a real shock to most of the army. Even Alexander and his close companions were not prepared to deal with this immeasurable and boundless wealth. 

Our thoughts automatically drift to the gold and the luxurious furnishing and ornamentation of the palaces. Still, we hardly would think of food, the oriental way to serve it and savor it. In the Greek Symposia, an all-male gathering, food was secondary to the meeting proper. The banquet started with a meal, and the wine continued to be served till the end of the occasion. More importantly, the host would regulate the wine intake since it was cut with the amount of water he determined for the entire duration. 

On the other hand, the Persians drank their wine straight, and sumptuous occasions called for much drinking. The long duration and the overall glamour contributed to creating extraordinarily refined and elegant events. The wide choice of savory, sweet foods like dates, for example, was a luxury unknown to many Greeks. 

Dining was an occasion to display Persian magnificence and sumptuousness, not only in their setting but also in the dishes themselves. The diners’ behavior, however, was far from elegant. Since the flow of the wine was not overseen by a host or similar master of ceremony, the Persians often became violent and not seldom harassed the king’s women who attended the meal. In this light, it is not surprising that the Greeks saw them as Barbarians! 

In both cultures, fish and meat were widely present on the menu. The main difference was that the Greeks generally roasted their meat and fish, whereas the Persians preferred simmered, slowly cooked meals. They enriched their marinades with exotic fruits and spices imported from as far as India, including saffron. Bread, rice, and eggplant, delicate sauces further enhanced the dishes. After the main dish, there was plenty of room for sweets and fruits as part of the following dishes offered. A marriage of foods occurred during the lifetime of Alexander and lasted for centuries entering today’s flavors and gastronomic influences in the world, particularly in the Mediterranean. 

It is said that in its heyday, the Persian Empire was the leader in refined gastronomy. Arrian casually mentioned the regiments of cooks attached to the Persian king’s services when Parmenion took Damascus. The Persian baggage train with noblemen's wives was camping there pending the outcome of the Battle of Issus (not expecting their defeat). 

Even today, it is hard to imagine the refined cooking and presentation of the meals marking special occasions such as the mass wedding in Susa. Cooks must have been busy day and night preparing an array of meats, fish, vegetables, and fruits for thousands of guests (9.000 according to our sources!). The logistics to cart the meat, fish, fruits, and vegetables to the palace grounds are achievements on their own. 

At that time, Alexander’s army was no longer all Macedonian but integrated with peoples from Persia, Central Asia, and India. The food habits in the camp had changed accordingly. In a way, Alexander conquered land and people with their specific cultures, including a wide variety of their diets. In his wake and thanks to the later Roman Empire, the Spiced Road was born with tentacles far beyond the lands touched by Alexander. 

Modern visitors to Greece, Turkey, and the Middle East experience these exotic tastes and other flavors when served a typical local meal. We accept them as a matter of course, but the issue was entirely different for those living 2,500 years ago. Most people never left their hometown unless to war with the neighboring settlement. Persia, which was much larger than today’s Iran, was at the other end of the world as far as they were concerned. To them, the world appeared from an entirely different perspective. 

The Greek-Italian chef Giorgio Pintzas Monzani wrote several pertinent articles on this subject in the Greek Reporter, which inspired me to write the present post.

[Top and second picture from Asia Food]

A few words about Alexander’s mints and coins

Coins with the image of Alexander were widespread and accepted throughout his empire and kept circulating in large numbers long after his death.

Research has revealed that the coins with Alexander's effigy started circulating much later than initially accepted. Until then, the currencies of Philip and Darius were familiar together with those minted by individual cities. We had to wait until after Alexander's victory at Issus in 333 BC to find the first mints to be established in Macedonia, Cilicia, and Phoenicia.

[Map of Alexander's mints (from Meadows 2014, map 1)] 

Frank Holt has made an excellent analysis of the Alexander coins in his book, The Treasures of Alexander the Great. The first coins were silver ones minted in Sidon and Tarsus between October 333 and September 332 BC. Gold coins emerged after his conquest of Tyre in July 332 BC. New mints were established in Asia Minor later on, apparently after his return from India.

During Alexander's lifetime, the known mints striking his coins were spread over 25 different locations such as:

Pella and Amphipolis in Macedonia

Lampsacus and Abydos on the Hellespont

Colophon, Magnesia, Miletus, Teos and Sardes in Asia Minor

Side and Tarsus in Pamphylia
Salamis, Citium, Amathus, Paphos on the island of Cyprus 

Myriandrus, Aradus, Byblos, Sidon, and Tyre on the eastern Mediterranean coast

Alexandria in Egypt

Damascus and Babylon further inland

Each of these mints had its own assigned type. Some produced only one kind of currency, while others could generate a wide scale ranging from small coins to drachms and tetradrachms. It is important to realize that the Alexander coins were minted according to the standard Attic drachma of 4.3 grams and that his tetradrachms weighed 17.2 grams. They helped to spread his image throughout the length and breadth of his empire, from the Eastern Mediterranean to Central Asia.

The silver collected from the Royal Persian treasuries contributed widely to the production of the tetradrachms. It has been estimated that between 333 and 290 BC (which is well after Alexander's death in 323 BC), approximately 60 million tetradrachms were produced, together with 66 million drachms and 12 million gold staters! Just imagine the vast amount of money's impact on the economy!

After the king's death, his successors kept the same currency system in place, although they gradually replaced Alexander's image with their own – still in Alexander-style.

The Numismatic Museum of Athens has a wide range of coins on display to pick our choice from. This trio of tetradrachms, for instance, displays the figures of Philip II on top and underneath in Alexander-style Lysimachos (left) and Ptolemy (right).

In comparison, Seleucos I, here depicted on a coin from the Antalya Museum, carries a more pronounced lion skin still entirely in the Alexander tradition.

Once the Diadochi became king in their own right over their newly delimited territories, their own effigy replaced the Alexander-inspired image, and the reverse of the coins rightfully carried the inscription, Basileus.

For a long time, coins carrying Alexander's image kept circulating because his veteran soldiers were used to receiving their payment in tetradrachms! 

The Temple of Bel in Palmyra in full 3-D

Until now, bits and pieces of the famous Temple of Bel in Palmyra have been reconstructed digitally.

A first initiative consisted of recreating two full-size replicas of the arch that at the entrance to the temple. Using the world’s biggest 3D printer, a copy-conform archway was produced and placed at Trafalgar Square in London and at Times Square in New York in April 2016 to celebrate a special world heritage week (see: In honor of Palmyra).

A second effort was made creating a 3-D image of the ceiling from the left-hand niche of the temple’s open Adyton, which found a place of honor at the National Museum of Damascus (see: 3-D imaging to the rescue of Palmyra’s Temple of Bel).

At present, the entire Temple of Bel has been digitally reconstructed by the UC San Diego Library’s Digital Media Lab. It includes more than a dozen sculptures, reliefs and frescoes no longer present in Palmyra. To this purpose, they used an amazing 3,000 digital photographs, among which some 900 pictures taken by tourists between 2006 and 2014 and made publicly available.

It’s a colossal job, the closest to reality under the present circumstances. It is impossible to ever rebuild the magnificent Temple of Bel that survived for nearly two thousand years. The 3-D reconstruction is the best our modern technology can offer.

From GPS to GPR. A new technology

By now, GPS technology has become a household item, and GPR is opening new ways for us to explore, although with a different purpose.

GPR stands for Ground Penetrating Radar, a technology that allows us to actually “see” remains of buildings that are still hidden deep underground. This procedure is particularly interesting in those cases when a site cannot be excavated either because it is too large or because the remains are buried underneath modern cities or constructions. An extra bonus is the fact that the pictures taken by GPR are rendered in very high resolution.

The process looks rather simple since GPR works like regular radar but can reflect the pictures from different depths. The instrument can be attached to a quad bike and run over the terrain that needs to be investigated.

[Ground Penetrating Radar map of Falerii Novi, Italy. (Credit: L. Verdonck)]

This GPR recently made headlines when archaeologists surveyed the hidden site of Falerii Novi situated some 50 kilometers north of Rome. So far, they have been able to recognize the market, a bath complex, a temple and several other public monuments. What’s more, they could even study how the city evolved from its foundation in 241 BC till it disappeared around 700 AD. It extended over a surface of 30 hectares, which equates about half the size of Pompeii.

The study also revealed that the layout of Falerii Novi is far less conventional than that of other known towns. Moreover, it appears that the architecture of the buildings is more elaborate than what we would expect from a small city like this one.

At the southern end of Falerii Novi, the GPR has pinpointed a large rectangular building that is connected to a series of water pipes leading to the aqueduct. The pipes could be traced further as they run beneath houses and not only through the streets as one would expect. The rectangular construction may well be a public pool.

In the end, of course, GPR does not replace hands-on excavations, but diggings can focus on specific areas and constructions as they will immediately fit into the broader overview of the site. At present, the data is being analyzed manually, which is very time-consuming. Scholars are working on developing some new automated techniques to speed up the process.

Similar surveys have been tentatively carried out at Interamna Lirenas (south-east of Rome) in Italy and in Alborough, Northern Yorkshire in the UK. Still researchers are aiming to use GPR to survey major cities as well. Their ambition includes sites like Miletus in Turkey, Cyrene in Libya, and Nicopolis in Greece, which are all spread out over a vast area. 

Personally, I would like to consider places like Damascus, Cairo, and Ecbatana,  which are entirely hidden by modern constructions. Unfortunately, the local governments inevitably have the final say.

An eye for beauty in spite of the daily challenges

On a lovely autumn day, I was enjoying a picnic high up the hills among the ruins of Tlos, overlooking the Xanthos Valley. My mind automatically drifted away to Alexander, who must have ridden down this very valley towards Patara, Letoon, and Xanthos. I pictured him proudly riding his faithful Bucephalus, who was happily shaking his colorful tassels and twinkling bells.

In my pleasant mental picture, I imagined a good-humored Alexander enjoying the ride and the beauty of the land with Hephaistion at his side. No history book will mention this, of course. The landscape, roads, or weather conditions are no topic unless they reach extremes.

The few such exceptions our historians picked up are, for instance, the blizzards that hit the army on the passes of the Hindu Kush, the never-ending monsoon rains in India, and the flash flood in the Gedrosian Desert. Otherwise, we can only use our imagination, and that is not easy since most of us have not traveled to those faraway lands.

I feel privileged to have trodden in the footsteps of this great conqueror on several occasions, but to truly appreciate what is involved, we would have to venture out on foot. Only a handful of braves have set out on such an adventure. Traveling by plane or car, as is common nowadays, does not allow us to experience the impact of the elements. The wind, the rain, the heat or the cold remain blocked until we step outside of our metal cocoon. We miss out on the smells of the land, the dust, the fog, the crispy frost in the air. The most common sounds of bleating sheep, mooing cows, the songs of the birds, and the laughter of children are stifled entirely.

The topic of the weather fully hit me when I drove south along the Zagros Mountains in a relentless dust storm. The sands from Mesopotamia were carried through the air in sweeping gusts. As long as I sat inside the comforts of my vehicle, I only noticed a hazy landscape, but as soon as I left my protective shell, the grains hit me in the face, stinging me with thousands of needles. The wind was tearing at my clothes, the sand was crushing between my teeth, and breathing became difficult. Alexander must have known such days. 

The role of the landscape and the climate during Alexander’s campaign became even more apparent to me after reading “The Road to Oxiana” by Robert Byron. This book is a true eye-opener when it comes to envisioning the full scale of his daily challenges.

In 1933, Byron traveled from Damascus to Baghdad and crossed Persia to finally reach Afghanistan one year later.  It is quite exciting to discover that long stretches of his route match the itinerary taken by Alexander more than 2,000 years earlier. The landscape is a commanding factor common in both cases. Then and now, roads run along the same rivers, pass the same oases and towns, skirt the same deserts and mountains, and use the same passes and goat tracks. I enjoy his descriptions of the many valleys in full spring bloom in Central Asia, where the fiery red poppies rule the fields as they still do in Alexander’s homeland. They are a welcome breather after witnessing the barren deserts with their frequent dust devils whirling around.

Byron hitchhiked on board lorries but also traveled by car or on horseback. Despite modern means of transportation, he did not move much faster than a traveler on foot would. Roads were often impassable because of flooding or flash floods that washed away entire portions, including bridges or other rudimentary crossings.

He used old caravanserais when there was no local governor or friendly Brit around to offer him a room for the night. Lodging was, more often than not, uncomfortable and dirty. He generously recounts the folklore details of such encounters, and it seems to me that life has not really changed much since the days of Alexander.

As I read on, I search for those landscapes and cities that most likely have seen the Macedonian army marching through. Places like Ecbatana, Persepolis, Pasargadae, Balkh, Kabul, and Peshawar, the crossing of the Elbruz Mountains towards the Caspian Sea, and the perilous trek over the Hindu Kush.

Byron describes a poignant moment as he descends to the Caspian Coast. In a few minutes, the world of stone, sand, and mud he had endured since Damascus turned into one of green-leafed trees and bushes. The everlasting drought made way for moisture as even his body somehow returned to its natural buoyancy. I imagine Alexander and his dust-covered Macedonians must have experienced the same kind of refreshing relief.

Insofar as possible, Alexander used the well-maintained Persian Royal Road. Once beyond that network, it came down to finding tracks and trails. It appears that Byron had a rather similar experience, and his worst progress was made after he left Persia to enter Afghanistan.

The sudden changes in the weather pattern are widespread in that part of the world, and Byron truly undergoes these extremes. He tells how it rained all night, how the river had subsided but rose again fast, four feet deep at times. Of rain falling like bath-waste turning the road into a river for miles in a row, flooding the desert, and turning every mountain into a cataract. He describes the dark skies as cloud-wracked set against inky jagged hills.

At one time, after passing the Paropamisus, he labors for an hour and a half, ankle-deep in freezing slush, to lever away the rocks blocking the road. Landslides were common, and he mentions how not one but a dozen such landslides prevented him from reaching Kabul overnight. A mile beyond the Shibar Pass across the Hindu Kush, which Alexander also used, Byron hits more landslides, heaps of liquid mud and pebbles concealing large rocks. The crops below the road, already half destroyed by a river of mud, are then menaced by a new spate.

Another exciting feature that is not mentioned in our history books, either, is the qanats. A very recognizable and ingenious water management system from antiquity that still exists today and is still functioning in some parts of the world. The quality of the river water could not always be trusted, but the qanats carried the precious fluid from the snow level high up the mountains or from clean underground water tables (see: The qanats, one of the greatest inventions of mankind).

Earthquakes were another frequent occurrence at every stage of Alexander’s route. Surprisingly, the sudden shaking that rocked tents, as well as men and beasts, is never mentioned either. They probably were prevailing events not worth talking about.

No, this way of traveling is definitely not for the faint-hearted. Yet Alexander and his brave Macedonians constantly faced the elements. However, I like to believe that many, and especially Alexander, had an eye for beauty as well. Byron tells us, for instance, that he reached the most beautiful part of his entire journey at the foot of the Hindu Kush. Of all places! After leaving the river, the road constantly climbed not in twists but followed a succession of steeply sloping saddles leading from ridge to ridge. I have seen pictures of this road in a presentation at the exhibition “Afghanistan, hidden treasures from the National Museum, Kabul,” and they entirely match Byron’s description.

On the other hand, flowers must have been plentiful in antiquity, creating landscapes that were familiar to Alexander. Nowadays, they have mainly disappeared from our cities and our concrete roads. I fondly recall the Macedonian fields covered with an array of spring flowers ranging from the white chamomile and pink hollyhock to the deep-red poppies and purple wild onions. The explosion of colors over the rolling hills felt like a homecoming. The land was pleasantly green, crossed by refreshing, clear streams tumbling down from higher elevations under the blue sky filled with fleets of puffy clouds. Yet, I came across the same picture in many other places, further east to Turkey and beyond.

Truly, so much, so very much remains to be discovered and disclosed on Alexander’s whereabouts!

3D imaging to the rescue of Palmyra’s Temple of Bel

These days, 3D imaging has become almost common good offering endless possibilities, but recreating a section of the Temple of Bel in Palmyra is quite something different.

We all remember how the precious Temple of Bel was blown up and thoroughly destroyed by IS in October 2015. It was simply heartbreaking!

As the beating heart of Palmyra, the Temple of Bel surrounded by the sacred precinct, the temenos, had defied the centuries (see: The Temple of Bel at Palmyra – in memoriam).

The most sacred part of the temple was the open adyton. Following Semitic traditions, it had two altars, one on each side. Both ceilings were cut from one single monolith stone which evidently did not survive the blast.

The amazing news is that an Italian team has entirely reconstructed the ceiling from the left hand niche using 3D imaging combined with some skilled stonework. The 3D technique is so well-developed that this copy matches the original in every aspect.

The 3D ceiling measures 12m x 1.5m and weights as much as 190 kg. It has now found a place of honor at the National Museum of Damascus for all to see.

[Picture from The Archaeological News Network - Credit  Yamam Alshaar]

There is no way this piece can ever replace what is lost but this is the next best thing. At least, we have the confirmation that from a scientific and practical point of view it is entirely possible to make such reconstructions.