Nowadays, saving
our documents and information on our computers is very obvious. Before the
digital era, we relied on typewriters and printers to distribute our pamphlets,
advertisements, letters, and books.
It is hard to
imagine that in antiquity nothing of the kind existed, but then the needs were
entirely different. Public information, laws, decrees, and other important
notices were inscribed on stone slabs or posted on walls in conspicuous places
throughout the city, and eventually shared with other cities.
Exchanging documents and letters over longer distances, as during Alexander’s
campaigns, required writing on papyrus, a lightweight material that could be
easily transported. His correspondence with Antipater, Olympias, Aristotle, Sisygambis, governors, and generals all over his ever-growing empire required an
active exchange of news and information.
Eumenes and Callisthenes, serving as Alexander’s secretaries, must have been
very busy and very organized. We tend to forget that they also kept copies of Alexander’s correspondence, official
documents, and perhaps private letters as well. This becomes apparent when Eumenes’ tent went up in flames after a
conflict that arose as Nearchus was
preparing the fleet to sail the Southern Sea.
Alexander had exhausted
his own treasury and had to borrow money from his friends, including Eumenes, to finance Nearchus’ expedition. His secretary was to contribute 300 talents,
but being stingy, he gave only 100 talents. Alexander
did not accept Eumenes’ excuse that
it was not without difficulty and decided to set his friend’s tent on fire. He
expected Eumenes to rush his money
out, and thus admit he had been lying. The plan went wrong, and the tent burned
down entirely, leaving a clump of smelted gold and silver worth one thousand
talents. In the process, Alexander’s
archives were reduced to ashes. It is Plutarch who tells us that Alexander asked
several governors and generals to send Eumenes copies of the papers that had been destroyed. This proves that Alexander did indeed keep a record of his
correspondence!
We so often read
of papers and books that have only partially survived or are only known second-hand or not at all, except for the title. This situation is inherent to the mindset of the time and to the degradation of the natural support used (papyrus).
Papyrus is a vegetal
product and a very practical writing support, but it is also fragile. It has
been calculated that papyrus documents had a lifespan of a maximum of one hundred years.
This may have suited the needs at the time, but the chances of having them still
around two thousand years later are very slim.
Chances of
survival were greater if there were many copies of a text, like, for instance, for theater plays. Yet, professional writers were expensive, and the costs were
borne by the author. In Roman times, wealthy citizens could afford to have
certain scrolls copied for their own use, but they would hardly survive after the Fall of the
Roman Empire.
Under
exceptional conditions, some scrolls or bits of papyrus, however, reached us. The
most telling example is the scrolls that survived the fire in Herculaneum after the volcanic eruption of Mount Vesuvius
in 79 AD. Only recently have we been able to decipher their content without having
to unroll the brittle carbonized scrolls (see: Reading the papyrus scrolls from Herculaneum).
Another situation developed in Egypt. The garbage
dump in Oxyrhynchus
that served as fuel to the local population in the 19th century appeared to contain a huge amount of hitherto
unknown papyrus texts ranging from the Ptolemaic era to the Muslim conquests in
the 7th century AD. The papyri consist of private letters and public
documents such as a variety of official correspondence, theater plays, records,
sales, wills, and inventories. The deciphering of the papyri is ongoing, as only
a handful of scholars are capable of recognizing where the bit of papyrus text belongs.
When parchment
was introduced in the 2nd century BC, documents stood a better
chance of survival, although even animal skins had their limits. However,
parchment was extremely expensive to make.
With the passage
of time, interest and taste evolved and changed. Treatises, studies, analyses,
and even books and poems went out of fashion and vanished altogether.
As the writing
supports were decaying, it is not surprising that documenting Alexander’s life is a nearly impossible
task, despite the second-hand recordings by Arrian,
Diodorus, Curtius, and Plutarch,
who could still access some original documents (see: Eyewitness
accounts of Alexander’s life).