We can state beyond doubt that Hephaistion was Alexander’s closest friend; he was his confidant and probably his lover. He undoubtedly occupied an exceptional place in Alexander’s life. One example is when after the Battle of Issus, King Darius’ family falls into Macedonian hands. Together with Hephaistion,
Alexander visits Queen Sisygambis, the Queen Mother, and
she did obeisance before Hephaistion
since he was the tallest and most handsome of the two. Alexander comes
to her rescue by saying, “he too is Alexander” – a statement he
would not have made about anyone else. Another example can be found during the famous Susa wedding when Alexander gives princess Drypetis, the sister of his new bride Stateira, to Hephaistion since he wanted their mutual children to grow up as they had. A last example is that Alexander wanted his dead friend to be worshipped as a god so that they could meet again in heaven, for which he asked permission from the oracle of Siwah, who granted him the status of hero instead.
Hephaistion was one of Alexander’s Seven
Bodyguards from the early days onward, with Aristonous, Leonnatus,
Lysimachus, Peithon, Perdiccas, and Ptolemy, but appears as
“Commander of the Bodyguards” at the actual Battle
of Gaugamela. In light of his more intimate relationship with Alexander,
he would protect Alexander more fiercely and convincingly than anyone
else. This same attitude may percolate through the trial of Philotas, who
was accused of conspiracy several years later, and where we see Hephaistion
as a most determined defender of Alexander’s security and safety.
Besides his role as Bodyguard and commander of the troops entrusted to him, it is clear that Hephaistion had many other tasks and responsibilities which do not jump out immediately but transpire through the accounts of Arrian and Plutarch. The historian Hieronymos affirms that Alexander reinstated the Persian post of Chiliarch (Prime Minister) solely for Hephaistion. His unique position is further disclosed and discussed by Andrew Chugg in his book “Alexander’s Lovers.”
I think we should see Hephaistion as a great diplomat functioning as a buffer between all the personages whirling around the royal tent, from the simple pages to the highest general and Alexander himself. As early as Tyre, he was assigned to find a leader/king for the newly conquered city. Another crucial moment was the orchestration of the Proskynesis, a general practice at the Persian court that the Greeks and the Macedonians considered abhorrent but where Hephaistion set the example. The attempt to put Persians and Greeks on the same line did not work out as Alexander wished because his vision was larger than his army's – yet he certainly had Hephaistion’s support.
There is a theory that Alexander has been poisoned or maybe unknowingly poisoned himself by taking too high a doses of the hellebore plant, a common remedy in antiquity to many ailments. I am convinced that Hephaistion would have looked closely after his dearest friend and could have avoided the poisoning orchestrated by an outsider or could have talked sense into Alexander’s mind about a more prudent dosage of his remedy (provided Alexander died of poisoning, that is)
Had Hephaistion still been alive in Babylon in his function of Chiliarch, he probably would have had precedence over all the other commanders despite his earlier quarrel with Craterus. This happened when Alexander invaded India - a conflict in which the king settled true to Salomon by stating that Craterus loved the king (philobasileus) and Hephaistion loved Alexander (philalexandros). This evidences that they both had a seniority position over the other commanders. We may safely assume they would respect their mutual position and unconditional devotion to Alexander.
Yet, in the current theory, Craterus was underway to bring the veterans back home and take over regency from Antipater (assuming, however, that he would agree to give up his important position even upon Alexander’s order, which he had ignored before when the king summoned him to Babylon), leaving Hephaistion in charge of the east. It is evident that Hephaistion would have spoken in Craterus’ name and acted with his approval.
It may have been possible for Hephaistion to “rule” over the other commanders pending the birth of Roxane’s child, who came into this world as Alexander IV. This child needed a regent pending his coming of age. I seriously doubt that the other generals would have tolerated Hephaistion’s leadership till that time (at least 18 years), but he may have avoided the kingship of Arrhideus/Philip III.
Each of the commanders was a
wealthy man by now, some keeping a court of their own, and they were powerful
figures in the eyes of their troops who only wanted more fights and more booty. Alexander’s empire had to be divided one way or another. Maybe most of
the violence and continuous Wars of the Successors could have been avoided but
not all. As pointed out above, in 323 BC, we must reckon with twelve powerful
men, i.e., the Bodyguards and Seleucos,
Nearchus, and Eumenes – in the absence of Craterus and Antipater. In fact, they were simply too many to make a decent and peaceful split. Hephaistion probably would have had the time and the opportunity to organize and
streamline the management of the many satrapies with some form of agreement
with Craterus in Macedonia. The succession of Alexander would not have dragged on for forty years
when each general could have been assigned a part of the empire to rule pending
the take over by Alexander IV. In the end, the Romans may have had a more challenging time conquering Asia, and those eastern
provinces would have been annexed only many centuries later than what happened
now.
On the other hand, Hephaistion would undoubtedly have
protected Roxane and young Alexander
with his life, for in his eyes, they were part of Alexander in many ways. There would have been no case for Roxane to poison the
Persian princesses were it only because Hephaistion would have watched over all of them
as his family.
[Picture of Alexander and Hephaistion is from Oliver Stone's movie "Alexander"]
Interesting theory... I agree that Hephaistion would have protected Alexander's legacy, but that the uprising of the generals would have happened anyway. The crucial point would have been for Alexander IV to be in the proximity of a true and strong protector. This obviously was not what happened.
ReplyDeleteSadly, even under the best of circumstances, Alexander IV would have no chance to succeed. All through his life, he would have been compared to his illustrious father. Nobody, absolutely nobody, could or would ever reach the genius of Alexander the Great. Not in antiquity, not today.
ReplyDelete