Alexandria's founded by Alexander

Alexandria's founded by Alexander the Great (by year BC): 334 Alexandria in Troia (Turkey) - 333 Alexandria at Issus/Alexandrette (Iskenderun, Turkey) - 332 Alexandria of Caria/by the Latmos (Alinda, Turkey) - 331 Alexandria Mygdoniae - 331 Alexandria (Egypt) - 330 Alexandria Ariana (Herat, Afghanistan) - 330 Alexandria of the Prophthasia/in Dragiana/Phrada (Farah, Afghanistan) - 330 Alexandria in Arachosia (Kandahar, Afghanistan) - 330 Alexandria in the Caucasus (Begram, Afghanistan) - 329 Alexandria of the Paropanisades (Ghazni, Afghanistan) - 329 Alexandria Eschate or Ultima (Khodjend, Tajikistan) - 329 Alexandria on the Oxus (Termez, Afghanistan) - 328 Alexandria in Margiana (Merv, Turkmenistan) - 326 Alexandria Nicaea (on the Hydaspes, India) - 326 Alexandria Bucephala (on the Hydaspes, India) - 325 Alexandria Sogdia - 325 Alexandria Oreitide - 325 Alexandria in Opiene / Alexandria on the Indus (confluence of Indus & Acesines, India) - 325 Alexandria Rambacia (Bela, Pakistan) - 325 Alexandria Xylinepolis (Patala, India) - 325 Alexandria in Carminia (Gulashkird, Iran) - 324 Alexandria-on-the-Tigris/Antiochia-in-Susiana/Charax (Spasinou Charax on the Tigris, Iraq) - ?Alexandria of Carmahle? (Kahnu)

Tuesday, February 24, 2026

The Trojan War in the absence of Helen

Hector seated
The Trojan War, as recounted by Homer, is a beautiful love story of Paris and Helen set against the cruelty of war when Achilles dragged the dead body of Hector behind his chariot around the city. It is the kind of subject we can still recognize today. 

Recently, I had echoes of another version in which Helen never made it to Troy but stayed in Egypt instead. One of the sources was Herodotus’ book "Histories". 

At first, I dismissed the information, mostly because Homer’s account was so familiar. When Heinrich Schliemann discovered the walls of Troy and Priam’s gold treasury in the late 19th century, the history of Troy and the Trojan War came back alive. 

Herodotus, a native of Halicarnassus, is described as ‘The Father of History’. He was an intrepid traveler, very inquisitive about foreign lands and customs. He journeyed widely around the Mediterranean, as far south as Elephantine on the first cataract of the River Nile and as far north as the Black Sea. He visited southern Italy and eventually settled in Thurii on the Gulf of Taranto. He may well have spent time in Cyrene and even in Babylon. 

Herodotus

This Greek historian lived in the 5th century BC (he died in 425 BC), roughly three hundred years after Homer. Both men relied on the world around them and on the sources that were available to them.

During his stay in EgyptHerodotus spoke to the priests of the Temple of the “Foreign Aphrodite”, meaning Astarte. They said that Helen arrived in Egypt with Paris after a severe storm had blown their ship off course. The couple was brought before the pharaoh in Memphis, who condemned Paris for taking Helen away from her husband, whether by force or not, and seizing treasures from Sparta. He granted Paris three days to leave the country to return to Troy,  but he kept Helen in Memphis. 

Questioning the priests further, Herodotus was informed about the Trojan War as told to them directly by Helen's husband, Menelaus. 

What happened was that after the abduction of Helen, the Greeks sent their forces to support Menelaus. The Spartan king and his delegation were received at Troy’s Palace, where they demanded the return of Helen and the stolen treasures. The Trojans responded that neither Helen nor the treasure was in their possession, but was held in Egypt instead. Obviously, the Greeks refused to believe them and laid siege to Troy. They fought each other for ten years, and all that while Helen waited in Egypt. 

When Troy fell, and there was still no trace of HelenMenelaus sailed to Memphis. After giving the pharaoh a true account of what had happened, he was reunited with Helen, 'having suffered no evil’, and the stolen treasure was restored. 

This looks like a happy ending, but it was not. Menelaus got cross because contrary winds pinned him down in Egypt for a long time. As an offering to the gods, he took two Egyptian children, whom he offered in sacrifice. This act of disrespect turned the friendship of the Egyptians into hatred. Menelaus was pursued but managed to escape to Libya with Helen and his ships. What happened afterwards, the priests did not know. 

Herodotus was not the only one to suggest that Helen never went to Troy but stayed in Egypt during the Trojan War. 

Euripides
There was Euripides, who in 412 BC wrote his play "Helen", in which Helen is taken to Egypt by the gods. The Helen who accompanied Paris to Troy was an eidolon, a spirit-image or likeness, cursed for her infidelity by the Greeks and Trojans alike. Meanwhile, the real Helen spent the ten-year siege of Troy in Egypt! 

It is noteworthy that Euripides was born ca. 480 BC, meaning that he was 55 years old when Herodotus died in 425 BC. He definitely must have known Herodotus’ travel history and the details of his encounters. Euripides may well have given his own twist to Herodotus’ tale of Troy. 

A similar eidolon image is introduced in Stesichorus' account. This lyric poet, who lived from around 630 to 555 BC, antedates both Herodotus and Euripides. The story goes that Stesichorus was blinded because he slandered Helen, but recovered his eyesight after writing her praise. 

Helen’s eidolon image may have been introduced by Homer or Hesiod, who reached his peak in popularity around 700 BC. 

In his "Histories"Herodotus believes that Homer knew of this eidolon version keeping the real Helen in Egypt, but that he decided not to use it, preferring the more epic poetry. 

Troy walls

Interpreting this ‘eidolon’ in today’s world is very difficult. We may think that Paris believed in ghosts since, according to this story, nobody in Troy had ‘seen’ Helen. It is clear that, in antiquity, the gods played an important role in daily life. Before the outbreak of the Trojan WarParis had built a reputation for making fair decisions, away from outside influences. For that reason, he had been appointed by Zeus to choose which of the three goddesses was the most beautiful: Athena, Aphrodite, or Hera. He elected Aphrodite, the goddess of love. In return, Aphrodite brought Helen, the most beautiful mortal, into the life of Paris, and they fell in love. The fact that Helen was already married to Menelaus, king of Sparta, and had a daughter, Hermione, did not bother Aphrodite. To alleviate the pain of Paris being separated from his beloved Helen, the goddess introduced Helen's eidolon. 

Papyrus page from the Iliad
That leaves me with Alexander cherishing the Iliad to the point of keeping it at his bedside. His copy had annotations made by Aristotle, which indicates that the Iliad was well studied and discussed by both men. It is unthinkable that Aristotle was not aware of  Helen’s eidolon substitute in Troy, and this goes for Alexander as well. However, I assume that Alexander’s fascination with the Iliad was mainly because of Achillesheroics. 

Tuesday, February 17, 2026

First results on the restoration of the Palace in Pella

Until now, very little could be seen of the excavations carried out inside the walls of the Royal Palace in Pella. 

The Palace occupied a strategic hillside, north of the city of Pella. It offered a sweeping view over the surrounding farmland, the port, the lagoon, and the two access roads from the city’s Agora. So far, seven major buildings have been identified, spread over a series of stepped terraces.  

In August 2022, I shared the news that the Palace had been opened to visitors (see: Welcome to the Royal Palace of Pella), but that turned out to be a dead-end lead because the site really opened to the public in the first days of January 2026. The reason for this delay is not given. The billboard on the site, as included in my earlier blog, is still there, unchanged. What happened on the ground remains an open question. 

Reconstructed sections of the Palace of Pella. Credit: Greek Ministry of Culture

The outline of the seven Buildings today appears to be marked with white pebbles in those places where even the remaining stones are problematic. The identification of the rooms has not progressed beyond the Andron (Building I), to the right of the Propylon entrance, and the Palaestra (Building V) and its swimming pool west of the Royal Residence. The other buildings are tentatively linked to certain functions, but without conviction. After all, the army officers and Royal Pages needed a place to stay, as suggested in Building V. Where to locate the Palace’s kitchen? Buildings VII and III have been tentatively dedicated to workshops or storage areas. 

Andron, the main hall in the northern part of Building I, is destined to host the royal banquets. Aerial view before restoration.

I still can’t get over the emptiness of the Palace, where close to nothing is left to show its grandeur, except its size that spreads further than what has been brought to light so far. The complex not only represented power and living quarters, but also functioned as a center of administration and military planning. 

How come the city of Pella proper has so many more signs of prosperity and wealth to show than the Royal Palace? The Romans thoroughly looted the Palace in 168 BC, and an earthquake in the 1st century AD seriously damaged the structure. In later centuries, the locals helped themselves to the readily available stones for their own constructions, leaving mere crumbs. 

On the occasion of this opening, two Hellenistic statues discovered in 2015 in the Agora of Pella are being added to the Archaeological Museum of Pella. One statue is that of a woman, the other has been identified as Silenus, a mythological figure related to Dionysus. 

Selinus [from The Greek Reporter]

Apparently, no statues have been unearthed in or around the Royal Palace, but no statuettes, vessels, shards of pottery, or bits of jewelry are mentioned either … 

Sunday, February 8, 2026

Gadara holds one of the world’s longest underground aqueducts

Gadara has been identified as the ancient city half-hidden beneath modern Umm Qais in Jordan. 

Until late Hellenistic times, the citizens of Gadara had to rely on a variety of cisterns that collected rainwater. So far, no less than 75 such reservoirs have been identified with a storage capacity varying from 6 to 450 cubic meters. After the arrival of the Romans in the 1st century BC, the growing population spread out over a wider area, needing more water than the cisterns could provide. 

Water had to be brought into Gadara from a spring 11 kilometers away. It probably flowed through a series of clay pipes buried underground, called Qanat Turab, making a detour around the valleys. Near Gadara, the water crossed another valley by means of a bridge and reached a tunnel under the city’s Acropolis. From here, it was distributed to the baths, Nymphaeums, and houses. 

By the end of the 1st century AD, however, the population of Gadara and neighboring settlements had exploded to reach about 50,000 people. To meet their needs, a daily debit of 300-400 liters per person was required. Together with the cities of Adra’a and AbilaGadara decided to build a second long-distance water supply running through a series of tunnels cut in the rock. The project, known as Qanat Fir’aun, was started in 90 AD to be completed in several phases by 210 AD. It is known to have been functioning until the devastating earthquake of 747 AD, which destroyed Gadara. 


I already touched on the subject in my earlier post, Preservation of the Roman aqueduct at Gadara, without digging deeper into the prowess of the Roman engineers. This elaborate structure started at a reservoir at Wadi Harier, near the Syrian border village of Dille, with a storage capacity of 4 to 6 million cubic meters. The water covered a distance of 170 kilometers to Gadara using gravity, in this case, a gradient of about 217 meters! How these engineers from antiquity managed to figure this out without the help of our modern technology is a pure wonder. For a good 100 kilometers of its course, the water ran through a system of tunnels. On its way, 14 tributaries from Lake Muzarib in southern Syria and several springs added their waters to the main stream. For the maintenance of the entire system, karezes or qanats, providing underground access, were added at regular intervals. 

Access to both aqueducts can be found on the Acropolis of Gadara, i.e., where the remains of the abandoned Ottoman village of Umm Qais now stand. Today’s tourist can visit the last section of this 170-kilometer-long tunnel in a guided tour. A real treat!