I don’t remember why exactly I purchased
Nicholas J. Saunders’ book “Alexander’s
Tomb, the Two Thousand Year Obsession to Find the Lost Conqueror” (ISBN
978-0465072033).
As far as I am concerned, everything has been said by Andrew Chugg (see: The
Lost Tomb of Alexander the Great and The
Quest for the Tomb of Alexander the Great) and to my knowledge no
new elements that definitely would have made headlines, have surfaced.
It probably was the name of the author that
caught my attention more than my search for any new development about the tomb
of Alexander the Great, and I was not
disappointed. Facts are facts and it does not matter by which author they are
expressed, and Nicholas Saunders has
projected the known facts about Alexander’s
tomb against the political situation in Egypt and the rest of world over the past
two thousand years in which people have been venerating the person of Alexander and his achievements.
His tomb remains enigmatic and although it has
been mentioned repeatedly in ancient history, nobody seems to have taken the
trouble to describe the tomb or its exact location. It seems it was so obvious
that it didn’t need to be recorded.
Ptolemy, once one of Alexander’s generals and later founder of the Ptolemaic Dynasty in Egypt ,
treated Alexander’s remains with due
reverence, and so did his son, Ptolemy II Philadelphus who deified his father as Soter
(savior god) and established a religious festival in his honor known as the Ptolemaia. By glorifying the Ptolemies
he emphasized their connection with Alexander,
whose memory was still very much alive in the ancient world, especially in Alexandria ,
the city he founded.
For the first time, I’m reading this
description of the Ptolemaia,
apparently reported by Callixeinus of
Rhodes, which throws a unique light upon the flagrantly expensive
celebrations held every four years. When Queen Cleopatra, the last of the Ptolemies died the Roman emperors were more than
happy to follow suite and to continue the Alexander
cult till the early Christian leaders felt threatened fearing that Alexander would be more popular than
Jesus. Then the Arabs conquered Alexandria
and built their own mosques, maybe above or near Alexander’s tomb.
But after that, Alexander and his tomb slowly sank back in time, although his name
and great exploits remained forever etched in people’s memory. In the 18th
century Napoleon and his entourage tried
in vain to retrace the burial site, followed in the 19th century by
the famous Heinrich Schliemann and
several Greek and Italian archaeologists. And in 1995 the Greek Liana Souvaltzi made headlines by
declaring that Alexander’s tomb had
been located at Siwah; the building she was referring to was, however, an
already excavated Ptolemaic temple. So, we are back to square one as far as Alexander’s Tomb is concerned.
The only “trail” we have till now is Andrew Chugg’s suggestion that Alexander may lie in the Basilica of San Marco inVenice , Italy . In the end, Nicholas Saunders is nowhere closer to finding
Alexander’s tomb and his remains, but the background information makes his book
interesting reading.
The only “trail” we have till now is Andrew Chugg’s suggestion that Alexander may lie in the Basilica of San Marco in
No comments:
Post a Comment