- A brief overview of Alexander's major conquests;
- Alexander's objectives (not only his pothos as reported by Arrian);
- The resistance Alexander met during his different conquests;
- How Alexander administered and exploited his new conquests;
- Alexander's changing relations with the Macedonians, the Greeks, and the Persians;
- A few words about Alexander's succession.
At the end of this fascinating book, he inserted an Appendix summarizing the current state of scholarship and several hints for future research on this vast subject.
In short, Pierre Briant gives the reader a fully up-to-date account of what has been written and excavated about Alexander the Great. His book dates from 2005 (in French) and was translated and updated again in 2010 by nobody less than Amélie Kuhrt.
Up to now, I was familiar with Pierre Briant's "Alexander the Great, Man of Action/Man of Spirit," where he skillfully manages to give a complete insight into the life of this Macedonian King with endless details, although here the history is being summarized. He has done the same in his present book, depicting Alexander against the Achaemenid Persians on one side and against the Macedonians on the other, both within his army and on the home front.
In short, Pierre Briant gives the reader a fully up-to-date account of what has been written and excavated about Alexander the Great. His book dates from 2005 (in French) and was translated and updated again in 2010 by nobody less than Amélie Kuhrt.
Up to now, I was familiar with Pierre Briant's "Alexander the Great, Man of Action/Man of Spirit," where he skillfully manages to give a complete insight into the life of this Macedonian King with endless details, although here the history is being summarized. He has done the same in his present book, depicting Alexander against the Achaemenid Persians on one side and against the Macedonians on the other, both within his army and on the home front.
For instance, he underlines the threat of a revolt in Greece led by Sparta, a realistic fear for Alexander as it might coincide with a major Persian attack during the years 333-331 BC, where he would be caught in the middle. He puts history back in its own context, including the position of King Darius, who was a worthy opponent rather than a coward, as so often related in other tales.
Or the fact that Alexander always tried to gain the support of the elite of the lands he conquered – a crucial aspect of his strategy where he gladly copied Cyrus the Great. He aimed at full cooperation between the conquerors and the conquered, as proven by an astronomical clay tablet found in Babylon – something his contemporaries didn't understand, and neither do our modern authors.
Or the fact that Alexander always tried to gain the support of the elite of the lands he conquered – a crucial aspect of his strategy where he gladly copied Cyrus the Great. He aimed at full cooperation between the conquerors and the conquered, as proven by an astronomical clay tablet found in Babylon – something his contemporaries didn't understand, and neither do our modern authors.
Pierre Briant also sheds new light on the Philotas Affair, which may simply have originated in his Companion's opposition to Persian customs rather than from a conspiracy, adding that by 330 BC, even Parmenion no longer served Alexander's needs. Another eye-opener I found was about the Opis Mutiny when Alexander sent the veterans home, while the real grudge may well have been the fact that the army wanted to go home altogether and with their King.
Even about Alexander's succession Pierre Briant has an interesting remark: If Alexander had produced an heir before leaving for Asia, the boy (assuming it would have been a boy) would have been ten years old by the time of his death in Babylon in 323 BC. The problem of appointing a successor would have been the same, meaning that a joint kingship of his half-brother Arrhidaeus and the boy (like now with his son by Roxane) would have been inevitable.
He also stops at the idea that is generally developed that Alexander aimed to create a universal brotherhood. Although he evened the gap between Greeks (read "civilized") and Barbarians, Pierre Briant stresses Alexander's remarkable political intelligence and wish to make lasting long-term decisions. Another astonishing fact is that Alexander managed to reorganize his army in two years (324-323 BC), creating an entirely new joint Macedonian and Persian forces.
A treasure of information and a most pleasant reading, as can be expected from this author. Personally, I found his updated map of Alexander's conquest highly interesting, especially the enlargement of his march through Bactria and Sogdiana (at last, a clear outline of his route to go by!). In short, this book is a must on the bookshelf of anyone who wants to read a serious study of Alexander the Great.
Also available as an e-book
A treasure of information and a most pleasant reading, as can be expected from this author. Personally, I found his updated map of Alexander's conquest highly interesting, especially the enlargement of his march through Bactria and Sogdiana (at last, a clear outline of his route to go by!). In short, this book is a must on the bookshelf of anyone who wants to read a serious study of Alexander the Great.
Also available as an e-book
No comments:
Post a Comment