A fragment from
a complex mechanism was discovered by chance near Olbia,
When, in 212 BC,
the Romans sacked
It was Gaius Sulpicius Gallus, who reported the
story as he had seen the object personally and knew how to operate it.
Livy, who died in 17 AD, wrote that before the Battle of Pydna in 168 BC, Gallus, an astronomer himself, used the Planetarium to predict a lunar eclipse on the night before the battle. The news was shared with his Roman legionnaires to prevent them from panicking, but the Macedonians freaked out.
A first reconstruction based on the section of the gear wheel found near Olbia revealed that it counted 55 dents in total. Noteworthy is the shape of the dents, which is not triangular as in the case of the Anticythera mechanism but slightly curved as used in our modern gear wheels. This shape proves to be more efficient and allows a higher precision. In antiquity, these wheels were created manually and the craftsmen had to do without the use of our modern measuring and cutting tools, which emerged only a few centuries ago.
Marcus Claudius Marcellus,
owner of the Planetarium, was sent off to
The Planetarium has been dated between the end of the 3rd century BC and the mid-2nd century BC. It thus predates the Anticythera mechanism from the 1st century BC generally ascribed to Archimedes. However, the analog computer may well have been reproduced based on Archimedes’ description.
It must have been one of the marvels from Hellenistic times, many of which still remain to be discovered!
[the section found near Olbia is thoroughly discussed in this YouTube]
Attribute the Olbia mechanism to Archimedes is obviously a hypothesis,but only a hypothesis. Why Marcus Claudius Marcellus should have brought with him a such a voluminous and delicate mechanism? Furthermore Cicero said that he see the Archimedes planetarium in the Marcelli's domus at his time. The problem is thinking that in Hellenistic times was only one a isolated genius,Archimedes; this is not true. In III century BC the research centers were many..was underway a scientific and technological revolution. Alexandria, Syracuse, Rhodes ,Pergamum,Carthage. In the same Syracuse Archimedes was not the only scientist or (as they were called) "mechanic". So the Olbia mechanism was for sure from some computation device...one of the many built in III century BC. P.S. if you create your a whish list i'm glad to give yourself a copy of "Forgotten revolution" of Lucio Russo,for exemple the paperback edition from 71,25.
ReplyDeleteNothing is carved in stone when we talk in history about what was and what wasn’t.
DeleteIf Marcellus had the Archimedes planetarium at his home as written by Cicero, he moved it from Syracuse to Rome. So why wouldn’t he take it with him from Rome to Spain?
Now, whether it was made by Archimedes or by one of the many other scientists of his time remains an open question. The Antikythera “computer” has been attributed to Archimedes but may well be invented by someone else – who knows …? So many bright minds were around in the days of Hellenism, and even in the early Roman times. Many of these people are only known by name because no written record – except maybe the title of their work – survives. But for many, even their names are lost.
It would be interesting to speculate about how much of today’s ‘knowledge’ will still be around two thousand years from now. How much of our digital world will still be useful and workable then? Maybe not much …
As you know, in history, yesterday’s truth may no longer be true today.
The main problem is how can you tell from a little wheel which mechanism it belonged to and who did it? why it couldn't have been built Ctesibius of Alexandria?
DeleteA papyrus called "Laterculi Alexandrini" contain a list of the men who had reached the
pinnacle of fame in various fields. The categories considered are those of
legislators, painters, sculptors, architects and mechanics. The selection is so severe that among the sculptors they are only nominated
Phidias, Scopas, Praxiteles, Myron and Polykleitos. It is evidently a
“canon”, which intends to consecrate the summits of human genius.
Among the mechanics he is named
Abdaraxo, “builder of the machines of Alexandria”. It had to be about
machines that were so famous at the time that the author of the Laterculi had deemed useless
any further specification. Yet we have no other Greek source either
Latin who has handed down the name of Abdaraxo, nor provided any clue for
understand which machines the text refers to.
Anyway who tells us that the Olbia mechanism was not built by Abdaraxo (or by the many others hellenistic mechanics now forgotten)?